This is similar to what I had to do for msp430 - I made a new constraint that was what general_operand would have done if it allowed volatile MEMs, and used that for instructions where a volatile's volatileness wouldn't be broken.
- Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation Richard Hulme
- Re: [RL78] Questions about code-genera... DJ Delorie
- Re: [RL78] Questions about code-genera... Jeff Law
- Re: [RL78] Questions about code-genera... Richard Hulme
- Re: [RL78] Questions about code-genera... Jeff Law
- Re: [RL78] Questions about code-genera... Richard Hulme
- Re: [RL78] Questions about code-genera... Richard Hulme
- Re: [RL78] Questions about code-genera... Jeff Law
- Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation Richard Hulme
- Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation Oleg Endo
- Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation DJ Delorie
- Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation Oleg Endo
- Re: [RL78] Questions about code-generation DJ Delorie