On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Paulo Matos <pma...@broadcom.com> wrote: > Hello, > > In an attempt to test some optimization I destroyed the loop property in > pass_tree_loop_done and reinstated it in pass_rtl_loop_init, however then I > noticed that pass_dominator started generating wrong code. > My guess is that we should mark pass_dominator with PROP_loops as a required > property? Do you agree?
No, "PROP_loops" is something artificial. Passes needing loops will compute them (call loop_optimizer_init). You probably did sth wrong with how you "destroy" PROP_loops. Richard. > Cheers, > > Paulo Matos > >
