On 11/13/2013 10:56 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > At least we don't need a Java source code frontend, no? Just keeping > the bytecode compiler and GIJ should be enough? That way we can > strip the classpath copy of everything that isn't needed, thus not > provide a Java library. Reduces testing coverage of GCJ to almost > zero, but ...
Eh? We don't even have a Java source code frontend. In a GCC build we compile everything from bytecode. Andrew.
