On Aug 28, 2013, at 2:40 AM, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: > Digging shows I at one point removed all this code - but people objected and I > had to revert it :/
[ oh,, sorry to hear ] I got rid of it as well, and then the test suite beat on me til I relented. > I suppose this kind of cleanup should be done on trunk, without introducing > wide-int first. I expect you meant, should be done on trunk and not the branch, however it can be read as withholding the wide-int branch from trunk until it is fixed. You did mean the former, right? If the later I'd object. > Note that rejecting all unsigned masks doesn't make much sense to me, > so it must be some special-case in the caller that is wrong. Agreed, but, it's independent of wide-int. When the wide-int branch goes in, we will notice if trunk fixed the issue or not and will adjust our code to match the then current trunk.
