On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 07:54:34PM +0200, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > Ondrej Bilka schrieb: > > >http://kam.mff.cuni.cz/~ondra/gcc_misspell.patch > > This is wrong: > > @@ -10834,7 +10834,7 @@ avr_convert_to_type (tree type, tree expr) > XOP[2] # Bytes to copy > > Return TRUE if the expansion is accomplished. > - Return FALSE if the operand compination is not supported. */ > + Return FALSE if the operand compilation is not supported. */ > > Should be "combination" not "compilation". > > > index 406617f..c7a7f7b 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/frv/frv-opts.h > +++ b/gcc/config/frv/frv-opts.h > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > -/* Frv option-handling defitions. > +/* Frv option-handling deviations. > > Should be "definitions" instead of "deviations". > > > -/* Expand SYMBOL into its corresponding far-addresse symbol. > +/* Expand SYMBOL into its corresponding far-addressee symbol. > > Is this correct or should be "far-address"? > > > @@ -5336,7 +5336,7 @@ pa_print_operand (FILE *file, rtx x, int code) > && GET_CODE (XEXP (XEXP (x, 0), 1)) == REG) > { > /* Because the REG_POINTER flag can get lost during reload, > - pa_legitimate_address_p canonicalizes the order of the > + pa_legitimate_address_p canonizes the order of the > > I am not sure about this one and many others. "canonicalize" sounds > ok to me, so does "canonicalization". "canonize" sounds odd to me. > For example the following which should change none or both: > > -/* Canonicalize the filename NAME by canonicalizing directory > +/* Canonicalize the filename NAME by canonizing directory > > - * Unique vinsn derivates from CALL, ASM, JUMP (for a while) and other > + * Unique vinsn derivatives from CALL, ASM, JUMP (for a while) and other > > Shouldn't this be "derives"? > > > - /* Merge c_expres found or unify live register sets from different > + /* Merge c_express found or unify live register sets from different > > Some lines above in sel-sched.c there is "C_EXPRes". Again, change > none or both (none seems fine here): > oops it was bug, fixed. > > - /* Test exponentials and their signs. A buggy lexer is more likely > + /* Test exponential and their signs. A buggy lexer is more likely > > Should both be plural or singular. "exponents" sounds good to me. > it is also in string bellow so probably we need change or keep both.
> > - Roger Sayle <...@eyesopen.com> > + Roger Sayle <...@eyes open.com> > > Don't change email addresses! bug, fixed
