Hi, On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > [... mangling change ...] > > That would not address the issue of interoperability of a C++03 library > with a C++11 program or vice versa if they are using any of the changed > interfaces for interoperability. Passing pointers to such objects still > would work and break unnoticed. But it's the best we can possibly do _if_ we want to conform to c++11 in the v6 ABI. IMHO we want to, so we have to at least make 98/11 code coexist in the same process image, which means mangling changes. That the code can't interoperate is understood. It will by the way not break unnoticed: interfaces using the problematic types would be mangled differently, and hence c++98 code would silently be resolved to a c++11 variant expecting a different layout. Ciao, Michael.