Hi, On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> There are two areas that do not yet have an isl counterpart. The > openscop import/export and the loop interchange heuristic. I think you > can safely crop the openscop import/export, as it is currently unused > and can later be added back if needed. In respect of the loop > interchange. I am personally not interested in a dedicated loop > interchange pass, but the isl scheduling optimizer does not yet provide > a valuable alternative. This is one of the other reasons I did not push > the patches through, as I was afraid of the discuss that the loop > interchange removal may cause (and I was too lazy to rewrite and fix the > buggy loop interchange heuristic). I assume you'd be able to help with answering questions when somebody isl/ppl-illiterate tries to fiddle with that, though? Ciao, Michael.
