Il 11/06/2012 11:18, Richard Guenther ha scritto: > > Instead of renaming Stage 3 to Stage 2 at that point we figured that > > using different terminology would reduce confusion. I am not wedded > > to Stage A and B, though this seems to be the most straightforward > > option (over colors, Alpha and Beta carrying a different meaning in > > software development,...). > > > Eh - why not give them names with an actual meaning? "Development Stage" > and "Stabilizing Stage"? I realize those are rather long names, but you > can always put short forms in tables, like Dev Stage and Stab Stage.
Or just "Development" and "Feature freeze"? Paolo
