On 2012-04-11 01:50, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2012-04-09 13:03:38 -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Robert Dewar<de...@adacore.com> wrote:
On 4/9/2012 1:36 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Maybe -Wstandard isn't the best name though, as "standard" usually
means something quite specific for compilers, and the warning switch
wouldn't have anything to do with standards conformance.
-Wdefault
might be better
except if people want warnings about "defaults" in C++11 (which can mean
lot of things).
How about a warning level?
-W0: no warnings (equivalent to -w)
-W1: default
-W2: equivalent to the current -Wall
-W3: equivalent to the current -Wall -Wextra
This is exactly what Microsoft C++ compiler does and what their Visual
Studio IDE exposes in the UI. So, there is a reasonable precedent.
Oleg.
