On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:42 AM, Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com> wrote: >> when you say that, do you mean you would prefer and expect: >> 1. native C++ style, or >> 2. you would like the C-style round-about and paraphrasing to remain >> unperturbed >> ? >> >> The reason I ask is that I expect a "proper" C++ implementation would come >> with a C++-native style of usage. > > I don't think that implementing vec.[ch] in C++ would necessarily entail that > big a change of style; adding 1 -> per line is OK, adding 3 is something else.
Expressing an idea in C takes me more lines (roughly 2-3 fold) than in C++, so I am a bit puzzled by your observation. -- Gaby
