On 4/9/12, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 11:51:56AM -0700, Lawrence Crowl wrote: >> On 4/9/12, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:55:46AM -0700, Lawrence Crowl wrote: >> > > A build conversion to C++ is a precondition to any source change >> > > using C++, though the two could be bundled into one patch. In any >> > > event, I agree that the conversion needs to provide value. Vectors >> > > and hash tables are a good early target. >> > >> > Hash tables? Ugh, what is wrong with the hash tables we have >> > right now in GCC? >> >> Lots of boiler plate involving casting to void*. Some of that >> boiler plate makes the optimizer less effective. > > Have you any numbers that back that up?
Not for the optimizer claim, as the conversion hasn't been done yet. -- Lawrence Crowl
