On 04/04/2012 11:06 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > So - I'll veto the switch unless I see 1) and 2). 1) and 2) can be combined > by transitioning vec.h to a C++ template class, with proper GC support. > (not sure that I can veto anything - heh)
I don't think I can veto anything, but I'll go on the record again saying that I don't think this entire plan is a good idea. Write a new project in C++? Absolutely. Convert a large existing one to a different language? A huge waste of time that will distract us for years from actual user-visible changes. I also find debugging C++ in gdb somewhat more annoying than debugging plain C, and at the moment I always go back to a stage1 compiler. Bernd
