On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Jiangning Liu <liujiangni...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> So I suppose for this specific case a pass that performs type >> promotion/demotion >> (as was discussed repeatedly) would be a better thing, and an enablement >> of trivial redundancy removal. >> > This case is from a real benchmark and this problem introduces huge
A "real benchmark"? That gave me a laugh ;) > performance loss, because it is in the nested kernel loop. Do you know who > is working on this type promotion/demotion pass? I think it should be > handled in a very early stage if we need that. Not sure if anybody is working on it, but talks were between me, Jakub, Kai and Andrew (public on this list). Richard. > Thanks, > -Jiangning > >> Richard.
