On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 17:29 -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote: > On 01/09/2012 04:19 PM, Patrick Marlier wrote: > > On 01/09/2012 04:04 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote: > >> On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 15:55 -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote: > >>> On my side, I was able to fix the problem with genome but the patch is > >>> not clean at all and I need to find exactly where and why the problem > >>> was fixed. > >> > >> What do you mean? Do you still see issues with Genome, even with the > >> returns-twice patch? If so, just on i686 or x86_64 too? With libitm? > > Sorry for confusion. Of course, I disabled your returns-twice patch. I > > patched at different places and I hope to figure out where is the > > problem and that it is not a side effect... > > I am currently testing on x86_64 with libitm. > > > > Patrick. > > > > Attached the patch which makes genome works on my side on x86_64. > Torvald: could you tell me if it fixes the problem for you?
Patrick: I haven't tested this yet, given that this seems to be an issue that we'll revisit for 4.8 and one that seems to need a more thorough investigation.
