Hi, I am sorry. I just hit reply.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Shiv Shankar Dayal <shivshankar.da...@gmail.com> Date: Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:46 PM Subject: Re: Heapless C/C++ To: foxmuldrs...@yahoo.com On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Rick Hodgin <foxmuldrs...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Shiv, > > You have a significant misunderstanding of how heap and stack memories work. > It's true that many architectures provide registers designed specifically to > access stack memory, but it is still memory--it's just that those registers > provide more convenient access to the stack, though a lot of that is also > legacy baggage. > > Local stack memory is often faster because it's used more often and persists > in the L1 data cache. But it's not in registers to be sure. > > Cheers, > - Rick C. Hodgin > > -- Accepted. My knowledge of computer science is very inferior. But is it not true that Bjarne Stroustrup himself proposed RAII to negate some of the problems caused by heap allocation. Also, you can refer to this Polymorphism without Heap Memory | Embedded Systems Experts which describes problems associated with heap. Many of my concepts may be wrong but heap is definitely source of lots of problems. -- Best regards, Shiv Shankar Dayal
