Hi, This is the second report after “GCJ Porting for RTEMS Status Report”[1]. During this time, I am --- Focusing on running the testsuite and fix encountered problem --- Submitting patches to related community
In details, I have got the testsuite result for boehm-gc, libffi and libjava, which can be seen in rtemsgcj project’s trunk[2]. For problems encountered in boehm-gc, they are fixed under Ivan’s help, and the problems can be seen in mailing list[3](Just search rtems for related information). For problems encountered in libjava, I have send a mail to java-patches[4], some problems have been fixed while others still in fixing. The patches have been send to related communities, although libjava’s patch still needs modify. For boehm-gc, the patch can be seen on java-patches mailing list[5]. For RTEMS, the patch can be seen on RTEMS mailing list[6]. For libjava, the patch also can be seen on java-patches mailing list[7]. The libffi is worked on RTEMS/i386, so there is no patch for it. Next step, I will +++ Make as more libjava test case PASS as possible and get the libjava patch merged +++ Move to a new architecture and repeat the porting progress If you have any ideas on this project, please do not hesitate to contact me. :) [1] http://www.rtems.org/pipermail/rtems-users/2011-June/008574.html [2]http://rtemsgcj.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/gcjtest/testsuite_out [3] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.programming.garbage-collection.boehmgc [4] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2011-q3/msg00016.html [5] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2011-q2/msg00067.html [6] http://www.rtems.org/pipermail/rtems-users/2011-June/008573.html [7] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2011-q3/msg00001.html Best Regards, Jie
