> Hi Michael, > > Thanks for running these. I spent some time this morning looking > through the results, they largely look ok though I don't have much > perspective on the the objc/ obj-c++ failures.
I had a quick look at the test results for 4.6.0 under Michael's name on the mailing list. The ObjC failures FAIL: objc.dg-struct-layout-encoding-1/t025_main.m execution test FAIL: objc.dg-struct-layout-encoding-1/t027_main.m execution test FAIL: objc.dg-struct-layout-encoding-1/t028_main.m execution test FAIL: objc.dg-struct-layout-encoding-1/t029_main.m execution test FAIL: objc.dg-struct-layout-encoding-1/t030_main.m execution test FAIL: objc.dg-struct-layout-encoding-1/t031_main.m execution test are not worrying. These fail on many platforms (where they are marked as xfails). But, in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-03/msg02391.html a number of ObjC PCH failures are reported; but then lots of PCH tests in the same report fail for C too, so it doesn't seem to be anything specific to ObjC. So, as far as I can see, ObjC/ObjC++ looks good. :-) Thanks
