Hi Rainer,
On 23 Mar 2011, at 18:45, Rainer Orth wrote:
On Darwin, we have a number of gcc.c-torture fails reported for
both ppc
and i386 which are bogus (nothing to do with gcc - but simply
warning
output from a system tool).
For dg-based tests these are pruned - I wonder if it would be worth
adding
a prune capability to the torture suites?
IMO this is the wrong approach. I'd like us to move away from the
non-dg testsuites if at all possible.
I personally agree...
... but when I suggested this for the (relatively small) ObjC set of
torture tests, it was not greeted enthusiastically...
(the problem voiced, IIRC, is of maintaining audit history of test
pass/fails)
... I'd imagine that this would be amplified 100x for the other
torture suites.
Iain
