On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 15:09, Ian Lance Taylor <i...@google.com> wrote:
> Comments? Approvals? FWIW, I agree with this patch for the same reasons stated by Ian. Other than massively increasing build times, I have not seen substantial benefits for having java enabled by default. Ada, on the other hand, has shown more usefulness in exposing bugs (particularly, middle end) and is many times faster. This is the kind of patch that requires more consensus or agreement from the java maintainers. aph, are you dead set against disabling java? Is there anything we could do to change your mind? Thanks. Diego.
