On 27/10/2010 07:47, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com> wrote on 2010/10/27 04:01:50:
>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:53:00AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>>> On 26/10/2010 23:37, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>>>
>>>> Everything went dead quiet the minute I stated to send patches, what did
>>>> I do wrong?
>>> Nothing, you just ran into the lack-of-manpower problem. Sorry! And I
>>> can't even help, I'm not a ppc maintainer.
>> I also cannot approve gcc patches.
>
> Sent it to gcc-patches too. I already sent another gcc patch there but that
> didn't
> trigger any response either.
> Perhaps you can notify whoever that can approve patches?
We have a convention on the patches list; if a patch hasn't gotten an answer
after ten to fourteen days or so, send a reply to the original post, adding
"[PING]" to the beginning of the subject line. (Sometimes it can take two or
three pings, unfortunately that's just a consequence of our limited resources.)
I see your first patch was posted on the 19th. Give it another few days,
then ping it. When you do so, you could also mention your other patch at the
same time.
cheers,
DaveK
