On 10/04/2010 02:16 PM, 3dw...@verizon.net wrote:
You shouldn't be able to call it as just _foo(1.2L); an operator name is
different from a normal function name.
According to 13.5.8/7 :
[ Note: literal operators and literal operator templates are usually invoked
implicitly through user-defined
literals (2.14.8). However, except for the constraints described above, they
are ordinary namespace-scope
functions and function templates. In particular, they are looked up like
ordinary functions and function tem-
plates and they follow the same overload resolution rules. Also, they can be
declared inline or constexpr,
they may have internal or external linkage, they can be called explicitly,
their addresses can be taken, etc.
— end note ]
Yes, they are ordinary functions/function templates; ordinary functions
with names like operator""x, which is different from plain x.
17.6.3.3.5 User-defined literal suffixes
[usrlit.suffix]
Literal suffix identifiers that do not start with an underscore are reserved
for future standardization.
Ah, thanks.
Jason
