> This is quite unreadable and not very informative.
Totally agree.
> Here there are two problems...
> snipped
I think that you are taking the wrong approach: you call
"cp_parser_range_for" with C++98 and then if such a loop is parsed
(the ':') you issue an error.
Maybe you should try to add the check to the "cp_parser_c_for" function.
Note that a range-based for always have a declaration in the first
sub-statement, so next the "cp_parser_c_for" will expect a ';' or a
initialization ('(', '=' or '{', IIRC).
If instead of that, a ':' is found there is your chance to diagnose!
Regards.
Rodrigo
