On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:08, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Michael Witten <mfwit...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 09:56, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> IMO, we have to bite the bullet from time to time in order to improve >>> the generated code. >> >> What's your performance function? > > See measurements at [1].
The point is that *my* performance function may be a measure of the availability of decent backtraces. > So, you will be able to use --enable-frame-pointer configure option. Most of the computing world would probably benefit far more from usable backtraces than from increases in efficiency; those individuals who fret about efficiency are likely better suited to fiddling with non-default flags.
