On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:21:05AM -0700, Benjamin Kosnik wrote: > > > So one way to move forward is to effectively have two manuals, one > > containing traditional user-written text (GFDL), the other containing > > generated text (GPL). If you print it out as a book, the generated > > part would just appear as an appendix to the manual, it's "mere > > aggregation". > > This is not acceptable to me. > > You have just described the status quo, > what we are already doing. It is very difficult to link api > references to manual references in two separate documents. What I want > to do is full integration, and not be forced into these aggregations. > > And I am being denied.
You are being denied by RMS. He controls the copyright, the SC has no legal say, and he's stubborn as hell.
