"Naveen H. S" <navee...@kpitcummins.com> wrote:
> The SH toolchain was built with the following patches and regression
> is completed.
> 1. sh-softfp-20100718-2131
> 2. sh-softfp-predicate-fix
> 3. Patch by Kaz Kojima-san at following link
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-07/msg00352.html
Thanks for testing.
> However, there were some regressions compared to fresh toolchain.
> The following list summarizes the regressions for each target.
[snip]
>>> Now all test results look clean
>
> Please let me know whether these regressions are known and okay?
"clean" might be a bad choice of words. I meant that results
are expected i.e. regressions I saw are NaN issues we discussed
in the list.
Although your list of arches and regressions is different from
mine, some regressions you've caught
> gcc.c-torture/execute/20000605-1.c (-O0)
> gcc.c-torture/execute/20060420-1.c (-Os)
> gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-ivopts-1.c
> gcc.c-torture/execute/pr39228.c(-O0)
> gcc.dg/pr41963.c
> c-c++-common/torture/complex-sign-mixed-mul.c
> gcc.target/sh/sh4a-fprun.c
don't look like NaN issues and we should know what is going on
in these cases.
Regards,
kaz
