On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 09:17 -0700, Gary Funck wrote: > On 04/07/10 11:11:05, Diego Novillo wrote: > > I would suggest splitting patches across reviewer domains. See > > previous merges from big branches for examples. This makes it easier > > for maintainers and reviewers to review the relevant parts. > > Additionally, make sure that the branch bootstraps and tests on all > > primary/secondary platforms with all languages enabled. > > Diego, thanks for your prompt reply and suggestions. Regarding > the primary/secondary platforms. Are those listed here? > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/criteria.html > We have access to only a few of the listed platforms, > (and in the case of IA64 the underlying OS is SuSE not > "unknown-linux-gnu"). > > How are the following targets handled? > arm-eabi, mipsisa64-elf
Hi, I don't know if these are formally equivalent (any taker?) but on the compile farm we have arm-linux and mips64-linux machines. I don't think unknown/suse/whatever version of Linux makes any difference for the criteria. Feel free to apply for an account on the compile farm, instructions are given here: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm Sincerely, Laurent
