On Apr 5, 2010, at 12:51 PM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

>> 
>> 5) There are a couple cases of GCC rejecting valid code (e.g. 19377),
>> or which there may be some debate about (19538) it might be worth
>> pointing this out. *shrug*
> 
> One of the goals was to measure the output when the input is
> truncated, or obviously flawed (no semicolons is very
> common!). Certainly if you can think of other (obvious) issues where
> refactoring or haste make general classes of errors I'm very interested
> in this particular type of pathology.

Absolutely, this is one of the reasons I'm particularly interested in common 
errors like missing semi colons, . vs ->, use of things like <::foo>, 
explaining overload set failures, etc.

> The valid code issues I can flag in the existing bug reports.

Ok, thanks again.

-Chris

Reply via email to