On Apr 5, 2010, at 12:51 PM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote: >> >> 5) There are a couple cases of GCC rejecting valid code (e.g. 19377), >> or which there may be some debate about (19538) it might be worth >> pointing this out. *shrug* > > One of the goals was to measure the output when the input is > truncated, or obviously flawed (no semicolons is very > common!). Certainly if you can think of other (obvious) issues where > refactoring or haste make general classes of errors I'm very interested > in this particular type of pathology.
Absolutely, this is one of the reasons I'm particularly interested in common errors like missing semi colons, . vs ->, use of things like <::foo>, explaining overload set failures, etc. > The valid code issues I can flag in the existing bug reports. Ok, thanks again. -Chris
