On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 05:01:24PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > > why not make this more explicit by adding an option --ld<ld> which is > > directly understood by the gcc driver? > > Feel free to send some gcc patches. I see no point in this. > We have -Wl.
I deal with a lot of host systems where shell scripts aren't a viable option for ld. Why make everyone write the wrapper script? Makes sense to me to have gcc decide. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery
