John Regehr <reg...@cs.utah.edu> writes: > I've updated the code size results here: > > http://embed.cs.utah.edu/embarrassing/dec_09/
The thing that bothers me about this is that you seem to put a lot of emphasis on the test "X generated larger code than Y" without any reflection of how much larger (it could be 1 byte, it could be 50 times). Moreover, aggregating those boolean results to yield things like "X generated larger code than Y NN% of the time" seems even weirder. Is this really useful information, other than for marketing? -Miles -- Vote, v. The instrument and symbol of a freeman's power to make a fool of himself and a wreck of his country.
