Jason Merrill wrote:
On 08/04/2009 10:17 AM, John Freeman wrote:Reiterating, to allow more freedom in implementation, we can just say it "behaves as" a template, rather than "is" a template.I don't see the difference. As long as they work the same, the compiler is free to do whatever it wants internally.
Ok, sounds great then. Like I said, I wasn't sure if that allowance was implicit in the wording.
- John
