Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > [...] Earlier Bradley Kuhn had indicated that this would be covered > in the updated FAQ, but I don't really see it there. I sent him a > separate message asking him to update it.
Joe Buck wrote: > [...] Since the FSF is the copyright owner, even if your reading is > held by someone to be correct, then the FSF's FAQ would count as an > additional permission. [...] Is anyone else uncomfortable that an important license is to require clarification by a separately updated, possibly contradictory FAQ? - FChE
