On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Roberto Bagnara wrote: > The point is that we had since long decided to make PPL 0.11, due to the > many little glitches people has reported and due to the fact that the > changes would not allow to preserve the ABI. Backporting all the changes > to PPL 0.10 would be a lot of work and error-prone. Given that the release > of GCC 4.4 is being delayed, what is the problem in having PPL 0.11 has a > prerequisite instead of PPL 0.10? Notice that we can give a strong guarantee > that no change is going to affect the code generated by GCC.
It would for example mean that people who had built PPL 0.10 for use with GCC, or installed a package from their GNU/Linux distribution, would find what they had built was no longer suitable and their distribution might not have a newer package. I'll leave the final decision up to the Graphite maintainers; I don't think this is something that should delay the release, or be changed after 4.4.0 is out, so if 4.4.0 goes out with 0.10 as the recommended version then the 4.4 series should stay with the recommended version being that not-cross-buildable version and 0.11 requiring using --disable-ppl-version-check. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
