On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Paul Brook wrote: > PR23623 (I suspect the status on that bug is incorrect, it's nt actually > fixed). The ARM EABI defines semantics for volatile bitfields, and gcc gets > this wrong.
If the ARM EABI really documents the semantics for that, implement-c.texi:Qualifiers does need to defer to the ABI just as the other items there, rather than using weasel words to the effect of "flying demons up your nose, ha ha". After fixing the mentioned bug that is; *with* the bug the current wording fits. ;) (Yeah yeah, I know: "patches welcome".) brgds, H-P
