Richard Sandiford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've been thinking about that a lot recently, since I heard about > your implementation. I kind-of guessed it had been agreed with MTI > beforehand (although I hadn't realised MTI themselves had written > the specification). Having thought it over, I think it would be best > if I stand down as a MIPS maintainer and if someone with the appropriate > commercial connections is appointed instead. I'd recommend any > combination of yourself, Adam Nemet and David Daney (subject to > said people being willing, of course).
I realised afterwards that this might be offensive by who it left out. For the record, it wasn't supposed to be an exclusive list. Other people have strong claims too. ;) Richard
