On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 08:15:20PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 09:11:18PM -0400, NightStrike wrote: > >> On 5/27/08, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > A third alternative is to issue a snapshot (at whatever time interval > >> > is chosen) iff there's been a checkin on the branch. > >> > >> I thought that's how it worked already. > > > > No, a new 4.1 snapshot was created May 26, even though the last checkin > > was April 8. > > That's because the tree is still daily updated with the DATESTAMP changes.
Ah. Then the DATESTAMP change shouldn't happen if there is no modification to the branch since the last DATESTAMP.
