Richard Guenther wrote:
I support the final-release-then-close approach. But can we get a
volunteer to convert that branch to GPLv3... ?
I strongly object to moving the 4.1 brach to GPLv3.
I too think that it would be a bad idea to switch the 4.1 branch to
GPLv3, and, therefore, I think it would be a bad idea to do another
release. Instead, I think we should just leave the branch in its
current state: people can put GPLv2 changes there to fix GCC 4.1.x
regressions. There's no particular benefit to actually "closing" the
branch; anyone who wants can always take a checkout on the branch from
whatever point they prefer.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(650) 331-3385 x713
