On 08/03/2008, Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Perhaps I was mistaken to state an implementation preference this
>  early, anyway.  It would be fine by me to have an implementation that
>  works in any reasonable way.  If the "don't free" approach proves too
>  costly, with sane API design we will know we can always rip it out and
>  go with "reopen and seek".
>

Well, like Jan said, there is no much API design going on here because
we just need to pass an extra "offset" every time we put a new line in
the line_map and retrieve a pointer to a string from a source
location. I think all potential implementations will work with such
API.

Cheers,

Manuel.

Reply via email to