On 08/03/2008, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Another approach would be to only use the carets for parse errors, > which is where they are the most helpful. For a middle-end error like > "assuming signed overflow does not occur when simplifying > multiplication" a caret pointer might be more misleading than > otherwise, as one thing we know for sure is that it would not point at > a multiplication operator. >
I don't get this. So, what is it pointing to? Cheers, Manuel.
