Hi, On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, J.C. Pizarro wrote:
> On 2007/12/07, "Linus Torvalds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > SHA1 is almost totally insignificant on x86. It hardly shows up. But > > we have a good optimized version there. > > If SHA1 is slow then why dont he contribute adding Haval160 (3 rounds) > that it's faster than SHA1? And to optimize still more it with SIMD > instructions in kernelspace and userland. He said SHA-1 is insignificant. > > zlib tends to be a lot more noticeable (especially the uncompression: > > it may be faster than compression, but it's done _so_ much more that > > it totally dominates). > > It's better > > 1. "Don't compress this repo but compact this uncompressed repo > using minimal spanning forest and deltas" > 2. "After, compress this whole repo with LZMA (e.g. 48MiB) from 7zip before > burning it to DVD for backup reasons or before replicating it to > internet". Patches? ;-) Ciao, Dscho
