On Nov 13, 2007, Michael Matz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The nice thing is, that there are only few places which really get rid of > SETs: remove_insn. You have to tweak that to keep the information around, > not much else (though that claim remains to be proven :) ).
And then, you have to tweak everything else to keep the note that replaced the set up to date as you further optimize the code. So what was the point of adding the note to the SET, again? -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED], gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist [EMAIL PROTECTED], gnu.org}
