On 26 Oct 2007 14:24:21 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do people think of this patch? This seems to fix the problem > case without breaking Michael's case. It basically avoids store > speculation: we don't write to a MEM unless the function > unconditionally writes to the MEM anyhow. I think it couldn't hurt. Providing it as a QOI feature might be good. However, we should predicate these changes on a -fthread-safe flag. More and more of these corner cases will start popping up.
