Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>> Note that I spent less time writing this patch than I did replying to >>> the e-mail messages on this thread. >>> >> You're probably going to hit the roof :-) but could you rename the predicate >> to can_create_pseudo_p? "may" is somewhat ambiguous for non-native speakers. >> > > Shouldn't we see this as a teachable moment for correct English > grammar? > > Ian > you are being mean.
- Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Earnshaw
- Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Kenner
- Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Kenner
- Re: no_new_pseudos Alexandre Oliva
- Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Kenner
- Re: no_new_pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: no_new_pseudos Alexandre Oliva
- Re: no_new_pseudos Eric Botcazou
- RE: no_new_pseudos Dave Korn
- Re: no_new_pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: no_new_pseudos Kenneth Zadeck
- Re: no_new_pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: no_new_pseudos Joe Buck
- Re: no_new_pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: no_new_pseudos Paolo Bonzini
- Re: no_new_pseudos Joe Buck
- Re: no_new_pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: no_new_pseudos Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Kenner
- Re: no_new_pseudos Joe Buck
- Re: no_new_pseudos Bernd Schmidt