Richard Kenner wrote: >> just as a small point, at least the ppc does behave differently with my >> patch then without it. Apparently there areplaces, at least in the ppc >> backend that did not generate pseudos before reload because of the >> abstraction that are now able to generate them. >> > > I'm sure that's true. >
[09:34] <Rhy0lite <irc://irc.oftc.net/Rhy0lite,isnick>> zadeck_: with your patch, gcc ppc will generate more pseudos for materializing constants and splitting some logical ops [09:34] <Rhy0lite <irc://irc.oftc.net/Rhy0lite,isnick>> which is good [09:34] <Rhy0lite <irc://irc.oftc.net/Rhy0lite,isnick>> instead of trying to do the operations in place with existing registers [09:35] <Rhy0lite <irc://irc.oftc.net/Rhy0lite,isnick>> creating read-write dependencies
