On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: | On 18/01/07, Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: | > | > | On 17/01/07, Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > | > ... thanks a lot Gaby both for your practical and theoretical | > | > investigations into this issue, both right to the point! Now, in my | > | > opinion, we should simply remove the bits about signed -> unsigned from | > | > -Wconversion. | > | > | > | | > | I am not sure I am following the conversation. | > | > here it is in pseudo-code. | > | > int x = some value; | > // ... | > unsigned y = x // please don't spit noise here | > | | Does that apply also to: | | unsigned int y = -10;
Yes. -- Gaby
