On 27/06/06, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, const functions are nonstandard, and gcc itself is written in Standard C so they can't be used. But As for const args, I can't see any good reason not to use them, and there are 400 uses in gcc.
I meant const arguments, sorry for the confusion. What about: 'const' applied to trees, for example: void foo(const tree type, const tree expr) Perhaps there is some drawback there?
