On 09.03.24 03:18, Peter Bergner via Gcc wrote:
On 3/8/24 5:28 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 22:35, Frank Scheiner via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
On 08.03.24 23:00, Peter Bergner wrote:
On 3/8/24 7:16 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
I CCed Jeff who is on the commitee to forward the maintainer proposal
though I guess this will not go forward as a first step. Instead
you are probably expected to show activity on the port, for example
post the patch series to make ia64 use LRA, get write access to the
git repository and then be promoted maintainer.
One other method for showing activity is posting regular testsuite
results on the gcc-testresults mailing list to show the community
the port is "working".
I don't want to spam this or the other list each and every week, but I
Sending test results to the gcc-testresults list is **not** spamming,
that's what the list is for!
100% agree! If you look at what we (IBM) post, we roughly post somewhere
around 7 testsuite results per day due to runs on different hardware,
endianness and OS (Linux versus AIX). So spam ...err... post away!
If you're testing uncommon targets (e.g. ia64-linux) then sending test
results to the list is essential so we know the target builds, because
nobody else is testing it.
Again, 100% agree!
Ok, ok, I'll do. :-)
Cheers,
Frank
