On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 11:03:51AM -0700, Matt Thomas wrote: > > Someone complained I was unfair in my gcc bootstrap times since > some builds included libjava/gfortran and some did not. > > So in the past day, I've done bootstrap with just c,c++,objc on > both 3.4 and gcc4.1. I've put the results in a web page at > http://3am-software.com/gcc-speed.html. The initial bootstrap > compiler was gcc3.3 and they are all running off the same base > of NetBSD 3.99.3. > > While taking out fortran and java reduced the disparity, there > is still a large increase in bootstrap times from 3.4 to 4.1.
There's some new code in libstdc++ now (the TR1 stuff) that (last time I looked) takes a long time to build, and wasn't in 3.4. Could that be a factor? A comparison with just --enable-languages=c would eliminate any issues with libraries.
