On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 17:29, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 17:19, David Edelsohn wrote: > > >>>>> Richard Earnshaw writes: > > > > Richard> On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 16:31, David Edelsohn wrote: > > >> The GCC build times are not unreasonable compared to other, > > >> commercial compilers with similar functionality. And the GCC developers > > >> ave plans to address inefficiencies -- GCC 4.0 often is faster than GCC > > >> 3.4. > > > > Richard> If you are going to make sweeping statements like this you need to > > back > > Richard> them up with hard data. > > > > What does gcc_4_0_0_release branch at time 2003-01-01 mean? > > Hmm, you'll have to ask the CSiBE folks that one...
In fact the time is irrelevant in this case, since it's not a branch but a specific tag on a single version. R.
