Hi!

If for RSHIFT_EXPR vr0 is not VR_RANGE or is symbolic, currently we make
the result VARYING, even when we can do much better just by trying to
shift the min and max values down.
Divisions/modulo already handles it similarly, and +/-/& also handle it.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2014-12-16  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR tree-optimization/64322
        * tree-vrp.c (extract_range_from_binary_expr_1): Attempt to derive
        range for RSHIFT_EXPR even if vr0 range is not VR_RANGE or is symbolic.

        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp95.c: New test.

--- gcc/tree-vrp.c.jj   2014-12-01 14:57:30.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-vrp.c      2014-12-16 10:17:27.543111649 +0100
@@ -2434,6 +2434,7 @@ extract_range_from_binary_expr_1 (value_
       && code != MAX_EXPR
       && code != PLUS_EXPR
       && code != MINUS_EXPR
+      && code != RSHIFT_EXPR
       && (vr0.type == VR_VARYING
          || vr1.type == VR_VARYING
          || vr0.type != vr1.type
@@ -2948,6 +2949,15 @@ extract_range_from_binary_expr_1 (value_
        {
          if (code == RSHIFT_EXPR)
            {
+             /* Even if vr0 is VARYING or otherwise not usable, we can derive
+                useful ranges just from the shift count.  E.g.
+                x >> 63 for signed 64-bit x is always [-1, 0].  */
+             if (vr0.type != VR_RANGE || symbolic_range_p (&vr0))
+               {
+                 vr0.type = type = VR_RANGE;
+                 vr0.min = vrp_val_min (expr_type);
+                 vr0.max = vrp_val_max (expr_type);
+               }
              extract_range_from_multiplicative_op_1 (vr, code, &vr0, &vr1);
              return;
            }
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp95.c.jj    2014-12-16 12:11:19.048361844 
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp95.c       2014-12-16 12:24:47.080308362 
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/64322 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-vrp1" } */
+
+extern void link_error ();
+extern void required_check ();
+
+long long int
+foo (long long int x)
+{
+  x >>= sizeof (long long int) * __CHAR_BIT__ - 1;
+  if (x != 0 && x != -1)
+    link_error ();
+  return x;
+}
+
+unsigned long long int
+bar (unsigned long long int x)
+{
+  x >>= sizeof (long long int) * __CHAR_BIT__ - 1;
+  if (x != 0 && x != 1)
+    link_error ();
+  return x;
+}
+
+long long int
+baz (long long int x)
+{
+  x = (x >> sizeof (long long int) * __CHAR_BIT__ - 1) << 1;
+  x = x / 0x100000000LL;
+  if (x != 0)
+    link_error ();
+  return x;
+}
+
+unsigned long long int
+range (unsigned long long int x, int y)
+{
+  y &= 3;
+  x >>= sizeof (long long int) * __CHAR_BIT__ - 1 - y;
+  if (x > 15)
+    link_error ();
+  if (x == 15)
+    required_check ();
+  return x;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "link_error" "vrp1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "required_check" "vrp1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "vrp1" } } */

        Jakub

Reply via email to