This issue is already fixed by your commit r218760. Thanks. Hale.
> -----Original Message----- > From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- > ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Hale Wang > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 10:17 AM > To: 'Vladimir Makarov'; GCC Patches > Subject: RE: patch to fix PR64110 > > Hi, > > This commit will cause another GCC build fail for ARM targets. The details are > descripted in the following Bugzilla linker: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64323. > > Could you help me to have a look? > Thanks, > > Hale. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- > > ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Vladimir Makarov > > Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2014 4:12 AM > > To: GCC Patches > > Subject: patch to fix PR64110 > > > > The following patch fixes > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64110 > > > > The patch was successfully tested and bootstrapped on x86/x86-64. > > > > Committed as rev. 218688. > > > > 2014-12-12 Vladimir Makarov <vmaka...@redhat.com> > > > > PR target/64110 > > * lra-constraints.c (process_alt_operands): Refuse alternative > > when reload pseudo of given class can not hold value of given > > mode. > > > > 2014-12-12 Vladimir Makarov <vmaka...@redhat.com> > > > > PR target/64110 > > * gcc.target/i386/pr64110.c: New. > > >
